Frunobulax57′s – Recovered Alcoholic

Alcoholism

Question: Describe "Alcoholic"

Time’s up. Pencils down!

Have you ever heard someone say that they “ALWAYS KNEW” they were alcoholic. I’m sure you have. You may have said it yourself at times. I know I have – sorry to say.

Then how come if I ask what an alcoholic is, I can’t get an answer that’s even CLOSE to what my Big Book clearly tells me? How can that be? Keep in mind now that these are folks attending AA meetings and who are trying to fit in an be members – benefiting from the AA experience.

They can tell us about all the grief that drinking has caused them. They can give a freakindrunkologue that will have you weeping into your cocoa puffs and balling through the night

But to give an actual definition, or better yet – give Our description of the alcoholic”they can’t do it.

So how do they know if they are alcoholic or not – and if AA is for them? They don’t.

Some coming to meetings for double digit years – getting their buck-an-hour group rap sessions without ever qualifying – thinking they are members – not passing on the “THIS” message – not giving away the common solution to real alcoholics – telling them things that THEY do to stay sober – that will KILL the real alkie. What a disgrace.

My friend Mickey Bush, an alcoholic if ever there was one (and an addict too) - says he’s got two parrots, Bill & Bob. He’s taught them to say “I’m an alcoholic.. . . I’m an alcoholic” - but are they alcoholic just because they SAY SO? (Please don’t confuse AA membership with diagnosis. No one is an alcoholic just because they SAY SO.)

Well, if I stand in the middle of a used car lot – does that make me a Buick? If I go down the street here on The Peninsula of Doom and jump into Vineyard Bay – and swim across it to Martha’s Vineyard = does that make me a Striped Bass?

No, what is likely to have happened is that they . . (Not the parrots) . . walked into an AA meeting and some arrogant ass said to him the same thing that was said to me. It was something like “No one gets here by accident. If you are here you are an alcoholic”.

Or maybe . . .

“It’s Friday night and your in a church basement with us. You MUST be an alcoholic.”

WHOA! Wait just a cotton pickin‘ minute there guy. What ever happened toWe do not like to pronounce any individual as alcoholic, but you can quickly diagnose yourself.” (31:3) See link

What will you will be told about these beautiful words from our Big Book? You will told that you are too STUPID to diagnose yourself. Of course it may not be said in those words. It may be couched in something like, “Your best thinking got you into your current mess so you can’ t trust your thinking” – but this is the stuff we hear all the time in AA.

Ok. But you can trust someone who doesn’t even know what “Our description of the alcoholic” is? – - who hasn’t learned for themselves the distinction between and alcoholic and a non-alcoholic? – - who thinks that anyone who drinks too much – too often, automatically is alcoholic and therefor qualifies for membership in AA?

You may be told that your brain is still “In the fog”, or some other such condescending tripe. Meanwhile, the Big Books historical accounts, ALL of which are about twelve stepping by the way, show case after case of still shakin’ and bakin’ alcoholics being taught to do just that – learn to make the distinction between the alcoholic and the non-alcoholic and see if they identify.

In the preceding chapters you have learned something of alcoholism. We hope we have made clear the distinction between the alcoholic and the nonalcoholic.” (44:0)

It is the ONLY way to concede to ones innermost self your condition – being TOLD you are alcoholic is NOT.

Wouldn’t it nice if when someone comes up to another says he doesn’t know whether or not he’s an alcoholic, if you they don’t know, they might want to set the ego aside and say something meaningful and helpful – like “I don’t know.”

Then they could be sent someone else in the home group who knows what they heck he’s talking about. It may save a life, instead of kill someone. Or send him to me – I do know as was passed onto me. I do not make the aforementioned “proclamation” – but I sure as hell will show that person, in AA’s Big Book where the diagnosis is – so he can LEARN whether or not he qualifies. Then if I am satisfied – by hearing his story, supported with his new found knowledge – that he is “One of us” (Not one of “me” of “US”) then I can take the time to show him the solution we have found.

I want to make sure he’s the real deal because as far as I know no one has EVER recovered from alcoholism who didn’t actually HAVE alcoholism – and if I waste time with someone who cannot recover from a malady they do not have – I may deprive another truly suffering individual from what we have to offer.

Yes it is an exclusive club – for alcoholics only! Not hard drinkers, not lonely hearts, not cheap bastards whose insurance has run out for out-patient therapy, not drug addicts, not over eaters – JUST ALCOHOLICS – those who suffer from alcoholism – by “Our description” – Not yours, not mine, not Oprahs, not Dr, Phils, not your family doctors, not your “addictions counselors” – just “OURS”.

As Tradition States: ” Our membership ought to include all who suffer from alcoholism. Hence we may refuse none who wish to recover. “ If you do not suffer from alcoholism or if you don’t want to recover – sorry, but bye bye . Let’s go fishing sometime – and we’ll talk about your food addiction – but right now I haven’t time to spare for it.

Someone else is dying from untreated alcoholism and the teaching and practicing the twelve steps for the benefit of the alcoholic – so he can RECOVER – is the SOLE purpose of the AA group and my primary purpose.

Peace,

Danny S

http://recoveredalcoholic.blogspot.com

July 11, 2007 Posted by | Dr. Phil, Mickey B, Oprah, Our description of the alcoholic, primary purpose, Tradition Three | Leave a Comment

A Million Little Pieces Of……………

A few months ago, I gave a piece of “Strangely Insane” to my sister, to read. She gave it back to me and said, “Maybe your book will be as big a deal as A Million Little Pieces”

I had not heard of it and she explained to me what the book was about and about Oprah’s Book Club, the whole deal. I thought WOW. But it brought mixed feelings.

First, having the egotistical streak I still do, I felt a slight tinge of disappointment. Gee, somebody else is doing this? You mean I am not the only one. The other was, Well, with the wild success of that book, perhaps the groundwork has been laid in the genre that surely has more room for the subject.

I began to read the book out of curiosity. (And because so many people had asked me if I had read it once they became aware that I was writing a book about alcoholism)

I could not get through much of it – for reasons I will touch on in another article. (For now let us just say it had a bad ring to it.

Now, apparently James Frey’s story is probably largely fictitious. Once again, I have mixed feelings. I almost feel badly for the guy, but I am far from surprised. I work with un-recovered alcoholics everyday, so there is no way I can be surprised. (SEE FAQ here please)

The only method of true recovery of which I am aware that really works is one, one eschewed by Frey, requires RIGOROUS HONESTY.

There is an old axiom amongst recovered alcoholics that asks the question: “What do you get when you remove the alcohol from alcoholic”

The answer: “IC”.
I do not want to belabor the point. But lets. Shall we?

My wife and I were talking about it this morning on our way into Hyannis. (She has been supporting us, working in a floor tile store while I pursue my writing career.) We are both grateful that I have never had to resort to embellishing any part of my recovery story. The story I tell is one that is the same one I tell from podiums when I speak publicly. It is rigorously honest – an honesty that has been necessary for me to adopt as a way of life necessary to recover from alcoholism. this is not because I am such a saint, but because if I resort to my old behaviors I am sunk.


There is no need to fabricate any part of a true story of recovery, because they will, by default, focus on the SOLUTION, not the PROBLEM. Whereas the typical “drunkalogue “will focus solely on the gritty PROBLEMS because in it there is no SOLUTION.

What it boils down to is this: Dishonesty, drinking, drugging, lying, stealing, criminal behaviors; these are all SYMPTOMS of an underlying problem. Take away the booze from a drunken horse thief, and all we have left is a sober horse thief.

It is for the best that Frey’s trash is raked through the coals. I believe that “A Million Little Pieces” (At least the little pieces through which I managed to suffer) proposes to harm real alcoholics – perhaps fatally for some.

While entertaining the unknowing and inexperienced readers (Like Oprah herself) with drama and what we in recovery circles call “drunkologue“, it also has the potential of proffering false hope to Real McCoys who desperately WANT to believe that they still have power – power over a malady for which there really is no human aid.

Such notions must be SHATTERED in order to recover from alcoholism, not bolstered.

The press has no tolerance for liars. Frey is now discovering this. God almighty! After having devoted my life to writing about recovery, I sure as hell would not want to be called “The Man Who Conned Oprah”. OPRAH? Are you kidding me? I would rather get an icepick in the forehead than screw with Oprah!

IF Frey indeed is a REAL ALCOHOLIC, then untreated alcoholism is his problem. If he had recovered, there would be something to tell. His story would have weight and depth on its own – without any invention whatsoever.

Perhaps now James Frey will see just how powerless he really is, make amends, and cut the Bullshale. He will have a chance at real recovery if he does.

I wish James would get a hold of me.

Now that he has given up the harmful substances, he has a chance to get well too – get down to the root causes that screwed him up to begin with. I can help him recover. MANY atheists like him recover.

MORE on Frey

Peace,

Danny S

January 11, 2006 Posted by | James Frey, Million Little Pieces, Oprah | Leave a Comment

Does Dr. Phil know squat?

The first three Big Book Chapters helped me know the
difference between the alcoholic and the non-alcoholic. If I did not
know this difference, how could I distinguish and diagnose self into
AA as a member? Dr. Phil might have a conception of alcoholism which
is very different from mine, which may be very different from AA’s.

Since I wish to join AA, it is very important for me to understand
what AA’S description of the alcoholic is. Dr Phil or Oprah might
think an alcoholic is someone who “drinks too much” and has “wrecked
his health” from drinking. For these purposes these definitions are
irrelevant unless I am turning to Oprah or Dr Phil for help. But I
am not, I am turning to AA for help at this point. So it was very
important for me to know:

WHAT ARE THEY DOING?: “help our readers determine, to their own
satisfaction, whether they are one of us?”

HOW ARE THEY DOING IT?:
“we shall describe some of the mental states that precede a relapse”

WHY ARE THEY DOING THIS?: because “We learned that we had to fully
concede to our innermost selves that we were alcoholics. This is the
first step in recovery.”

HOW DO THEY JUSTIFY THIS APPROACH?: “The delusion that we are like
other people, or presently may be, has to be smashed.”

Peace,

Danny S

October 26, 2004 Posted by | Dr. Phil, Oprah | Leave a Comment

   

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.